The Channel Selection Decision Tree: Choose Distribution by Product Shape

A practical way to pick a primary and secondary channel based on what your product *is*, not what sounds cool.

December 12, 2025
3 min read
Distribution
distribution
strategy
validation
positioning

The Channel Selection Decision Tree: Choose Distribution by Product Shape

Most early distribution advice is backwards.

It starts with channels (“do SEO,” “do ads,” “go viral”) and then tries to force your product into them.

A better approach is to start with product shape:

  • What does the product output?
  • What does the buyer need to believe?
  • What is the pricing model?
  • How does trust get transferred?

Then choose the channels that match.

This article provides a simple decision tree.

Step 1: Identify your product shape

Use these questions:

  1. Is the value immediately demoable?

    • Can you show the “aha” in under 60 seconds?
  2. Is the value shareable?

    • Does the product create an artifact people want to share publicly?
  3. Is there established comparison intent?

    • Do buyers search “alternatives” and “vs” in your category?
  4. Is the buyer local-language or identity-driven?

    • Is there a strong wedge in language, norms, compliance, or trust?
  5. What is the price shape?

    • low-ticket self-serve
    • mid-ticket self-serve
    • high-ticket sales-assisted

Step 2: Map shape to channels

If value is demoable → trust-asset channels

Primary channels:

  • short demo video
  • live demo/webinar
  • feature-first launch narrative

Why: trust transfers through seeing.

If output is shareable → viral loop channels

Primary channels:

  • public artifacts (badges, scorecards, benchmarks)
  • trend-driven distribution (waves)

Why: sharing is the distribution.

If comparison intent exists → bottom-of-funnel content

Primary channels:

  • alternatives/versus/best-of pages
  • comparison landing pages

Why: you intercept decision-time traffic.

If language/identity wedge exists → localization + local SEO

Primary channels:

  • localized landing pages
  • local communities
  • non-English SEO

Why: fit is the differentiator.

If price is high-ticket → sales motion channels

Primary channels:

  • outbound to a curated list
  • high-trust demos
  • paid acquisition only after economics gate

Why: high-ticket requires qualification and belief.

Step 3: Choose primary + secondary

A practical rule:

  • Choose a primary channel where you can run 3–5 tests in 7–14 days.
  • Choose a secondary channel that shares assets with the primary.

Examples:

  • Feature-first launch (primary) + waitlist nurture (secondary)
  • Trend-driven distribution (primary) + shareable artifact loop (secondary)
  • Comparison pages (primary) + waitlist capture (secondary)

Step 4: Add the economics constraint

Channel choice is constrained by pricing.

  • If you need paid acquisition, the economics must support it.
  • If you’re low-ticket and can’t rely on virality or SEO, the model may be wrong.

Common mistakes

  • Picking channels based on founder preference rather than product shape.
  • Trying to run ads without validating the sales motion.
  • Doing SEO without bottom-of-funnel intent.
  • Doing virality without a shareable artifact.

Takeaways

  • Choose distribution by product shape, not trends.
  • Map demoable value to trust-asset channels.
  • Map shareable outputs to viral loops.
  • Map comparison intent to BOFU pages.
  • Let pricing and economics constrain channel choices.